ArticleF1000Research2025
A Questionnaire Dataset on Perceived Stress in Indian Higher Education Students during Emergency Remote Learning.
Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a sudden shift to Emergency Remote Learning, significantly impacting students' mental health. This study visualizes and analyses various stressors contributing to stress levels among university students during Emergency Remote Learning and explores how different factors from environmental and instructional mediums contribute to their perceived stress. Method: Data was collected through a cross-sectional survey using the Modified Perceived Stress Scale and an additional set of 20 Likert scale items on Emergency Remote Learning. One-sample t-tests were performed to assess the consistency of responses across questionnaire items, and correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationships between different stressors. Frequency distributions were also analyzed to capture the prevalence of stress levels across demographic, environmental, and instructional variables. Conclusion: The study revealed that frequent thoughts about unaccomplished tasks were associated with high stress (14.12%). Other factors include feeling nervous and stressed, feeling things that are not going their way, and difficulties piling up significantly elevated stress levels. Items specific to Emergency Remote Learning revealed that a sudden shift to Remote Learning heavily influenced students' mental well-being. Additionally, demographic analysis showed that students aged 21 experienced the highest stress levels. Living arrangements, internet connectivity, and the impact of COVID-19 on close affinities further contributed to stress. This study underscores the complexity of stress during Emergency Remote Learning. It emphasizes the need for institutions to address psychological and instructional factors to support students better during remote learning environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.