ArticleAddiction research & theory2025
Ambulatory assessment to advance the science of nondrug reward in addiction and recovery.
Article in Addiction research & theory, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Experiencing nondrug reward can promote the transition from addiction to recovery, as indicated by animal and human studies; further, several effective behavioral interventions to promote addiction recovery directly or indirectly target nondrug reward. However, investigations of nondrug reward have occurred primarily within laboratories or clinics, which may limit generalizations about how nondrug reward experiences unfold in daily life. Understanding how daily contexts shape opportunities and appraisals of nondrug rewards and how nondrug reward experiences link to acute recovery outcomes could inform existing or new nondrug reward interventions delivered via mobile devices (e.g., smartphone). Ambulatory assessment, an approach for collecting a variety of self-report and passive data in daily life, is becoming routinely used among many behavioral health scientists; yet its potential has not been realized in studying nondrug reward. This article surveys the ways in which ambulatory assessment can advance the science of nondrug reward in addiction and recovery. This includes defining characteristics (e.g., hedonic versus eudaimonic), elucidating within-person dynamic aspects (e.g., momentary experiences of nondrug reward events and changes with time in recovery), and providing insight into real-world experiences of nondrug reward in socio-spatial contexts (e.g., dynamic exposure to drug and nondrug reward opportunities). Each area is discussed, including a section that describes challenges and opportunities (e.g., measuring "pure" instances of nondrug reward given nicotine use and intermittent substance use). The conclusion focuses on other considerations of studying nondrug reward with ambulatory assessment and on early development of some mobile health interventions that address nondrug reward to support recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.