ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Distributed and gradual microstructure changes are associated with the emergence of behavioural benefit from memory reactivation.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insular spontaneous activity changes after dialectical behavior therapy skills training for depressed patients with non-suicidal self-injury: a randomized controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Could sleep engineering be used to combat PTSD and depression?PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Cueing memory reactivation during NREM sleep engenders long-term plasticity in both brain and behaviour.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Memory reactivation during sleep is known to have an impact upon the gradual consolidation of memory traces, but the nature of plastic changes induced by such reactivation remains unclear. Here, we use diffusion-weighted imaging to track the location and timescale of microstructural changes associated with behavioural effects of Targeted Memory Reactivation (TMR) 20 days post-manipulation, when the behavioural effect first became significant. Because we used a serial reaction time task that is known to draw on the sensorimotor system as well as both medial temporal and striatal memory systems, we included all these areas as regions of interest. We also included precuneus, a structure known for plasticity relating to the neural engram. Our analysis was based on correlations between behavioural benefit of TMR and microstructural plasticity over early (first 24 h) and late (24 h to 10 days) consolidation periods. This showed significant TMR-related microstructural plasticity in the striatum over the early period. Over the late period, we observed TMR-related microstructural changes in both sensorimotor cortex and precuneus. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that TMR-related microstructural changes correlate with subsequent memory benefits across multiple brain regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.