Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860563›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Caution on the severe damage of

Yawen Zhao, Bisheng Shen, Qimei Xiao, Yameng Wang, Yi Fu, Qi Tang, Zhangrong Liang

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewCase ReportsMeta-Analysis
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Epidemiological and clinical analysis ofFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yawen Zhao *The Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.
Bisheng Shen *The Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.
Qimei XiaoThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.
Yameng WangThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.
Yi FuFoshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.
Qi TangThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.
Zhangrong LiangThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study reports a familial Gelsemium elegans poisoning case and systematically evaluates the efficacy of gastric lavage in Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang Data (2000-2024). Eligible randomized controlled trials and case reports comparing gastric lavage versus non-lavage approaches were included. Data were extracted from published studies, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models. Results: Thirteen studies involving 160 patients demonstrated an overall in-hospital mortality of 18.75%. Gastric lavage suggested potential survival benefit compared to controls (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.15-0.99; Conclusion:

Indexed as

Gastric LavageGelsemiumPoisoningAdultFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle Agedgastric lavageGelsemium eleganspoisoningrespiratory depressionreview-systematic

Identifiers

PMID40860563
PMCPMC12375676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.