ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
An analysis of freshmen's knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the influencing factors at a university in Wuhu City: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- KAP related to first aid among first-year ethnic minority students: a cross-sectional study using latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to investigate the current status of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among freshmen at a college in Wuhu City. It also sought to identify the factors that influence these aspects and provide insights for enhancing CPR KAP among students. Methods: A convenience sampling method was used to select 1,550 college students from a university in Wuhu, Anhui Province, in 2024. A comprehensive general information questionnaire was developed following a review of databases, such as China Knowledge Infrastructure and PubMed. The CPR KAP scale, along with the General Self-Efficacy Scale and the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), were utilized for the web-based survey conducted through Questionnaire Star. Descriptive and quantitative methods were employed for statistical analysis. Results: Out of the 1,600 questionnaires collected, 50 responses were deemed invalid and subsequently excluded, resulting in 1,550 valid questionnaires and a validity rate of 96.7%. Consequently, the study included 1,550 participants, comprising 459 men and 1,091 women. The overall CPR KAP score for freshmen was 62.55 ± 13.74, with component scores for KAP being 31.17 ± 9.26, 24.56 ± 4.97, and 6.83 ± 5.51, respectively. Comparisons of scores across variables, such as gender, age, domicile location, self-perceived health status, parental education levels, first-aid training experience, presence of medical professionals in the family, experience with emergencies such as cardiac arrest, CPR training in previous curricula, and family health status, revealed statistically significant differences ( Conclusion: To enhance freshmen's CPR KAP, future interventions should prioritize improving their general self-efficacy and eHEALS. Evidence suggests that strengthening self-efficacy can significantly enhance students' confidence in performing CPR during emergencies. Furthermore, fostering eHEALS equips freshmen with the skills to comprehend and utilize health-related information effectively, which, in turn, promotes more positive attitudes and behaviors toward CPR adoption and practice. By focusing on these key areas, educational strategies can be developed to strengthen CPR preparedness among freshmen, ensuring that they are better equipped to respond in life-threatening situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.