ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Neural Correlates of Rhythm in Post-Stroke Aphasia.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with post-stroke aphasia have long been observed to show relatively preserved musical and rhythm abilities in the presence of varied, and often profound, language impairments. Accordingly, speech-language pathologists frequently use rhythm-based strategies (e.g., tapping) to facilitate speech output in people with aphasia. However, there is little empirical work to support the clinical practice of using rhythm techniques. In this study, we investigated the neural bases of rhythm in aphasia by combining thorough behavioral rhythm assessments with structural brain imaging. Individuals with chronic, post-stroke aphasia (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.