Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860525›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2025

Integrated logistic sigmoid model and graphical analyses of concentration-response relationships of copper sulfate toxicity in aquatic organisms.

Djohan Djohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Djohan DjohanFaculty of Biology, Satya Wacana Christian University, Diponegoro St. 52 - 60, Salatiga, Central Java 50711, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The logistic sigmoid model (LSM) of concentration-response relationships (CRRs) of copper sulfate in aquatic organisms encounters three problems, which are diverse types of toxicities, wide ranges of effect concentrations, and various patterns of graphical CRRs. These problems have caused difficulties in evaluating patterns of toxicities from abundant studies, comparing toxicities among various concentration levels, and drawing interpretations from numerous graphical analyses. A study addressing the problems and difficulties is urgently needed to increase the understanding of copper sulfate toxicity and its application in risk assessment and aquaculture. The aquatic organisms used in the present study consisted of fish (Cypriniformes, Cichliformes, and Salmoniformes) and invertebrate parasites (Amyloodinium spp., Icthyobodo spp., and Anacanthorus spp.). In this study, 10 LSM-based effect selection criteria were developed and used, a set of low-medium-high (LMH) and sigmoid-flat-quadrant (SFQ) graphs were created to evaluate a set of sublethal and lethal CRRs, and the usefulness of LSM-LMH-SFQ in aquatic toxicology was discussed. The 10 selection criteria included three concentration types, two slopes, three coefficients of variation, and two data fitness to the model requirements. Out of nine sublethal effects, three selected ones were chosen based on the 10 criteria. Likewise, three selected lethal effects out of seven were chosen. The SFQ graph identified a highly selected sublethal effect (Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances, TBARS) and a highly lethal effect (LC

Indexed as

Concentration response relationship (CRR)Copper sulfateLogistic sigmoid model (LSM)Low-medium-high (LMH) graphSigmoid flat quadrant (SFQ) graph

Identifiers

PMID40860525
PMCPMC12374439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.