ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Risk of Treatment Failure in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy From an Academic Medical Center in Kentucky.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Antimicrobial Transition Errors from Hospitals to Skilled Nursing Facilities.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- [Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: challenges and opportunities].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has many benefits, yet factors contributing to treatment failure are not well understood. This study aimed to identify risk factors for OPAT failure by comparing successful patients to those failing therapy. Methods: Adult patients referred and discharged to receive OPAT in the home from August 2019 and May 2021 were included. Patients were excluded if they received OPAT at a nonhome location or had creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min. Patient demographics, as well as admission-related information, were collected. The primary composite outcome was OPAT failure defined as infection nonresolution or new infection, medication modification, or hospital readmission. Bivariate followed by multivariate analysis was used to identify factors that increased a patient's risk of failing therapy. Additional analysis examined predictors of loss to follow-up. Results: Of the 823 patients included, 588 (71.4%) successfully completed therapy with 195 (23.7%) experiencing failure. Forty (4.9%) patients were lost to follow-up. Of the failures, 109 (55.9%) experienced readmission, 63 (32.3%) experienced new or persistent infection, and 23 (11.8%) required therapy modification. Factors associated with failure included infection with vancomycin-resistant Conclusions: Simplifying home-based antimicrobial regimens may improve OPAT outcomes. Early identification of risk factors for OPAT treatment failure and loss to follow-up can optimize patient management and reduce adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.