Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860494›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2025

Employment and Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder: Findings from Longitudinal Qualitative Interviews Conducted with Patients Recruited from Drug Treatment Services.

Joanne Neale, Sarah Cosgrove, James Cassidy, John Strang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanne NealeAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8BB, UK.
Sarah CosgroveAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8BB, UK.
James CassidyAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8BB, UK.
John StrangAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8BB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-2725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Associations between substance use and unemployment are well established but complex. People dependent on opioids often want to work but encounter barriers, including requirements to attend services and/or pharmacies frequently. Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) is a new pharmacological treatment for opioid use disorder, which reduces such attendance requirements. Studies indicate positive associations between LAIB treatment and employment, but there has been no detailed analysis of this topic. Methods: Longitudinal qualitative interviews were conducted with 26 people (18 males; 8 females) initiating LAIB in English and Welsh drug treatment services. Participants were interviewed by telephone up to six times over a year (125 interviews in total). Interview data were used to produce narrative accounts of each participant's work-related experiences. These accounts were then combined and analysed via Iterative Categorization. Results: Participants reported mixed education and employment histories. At first interview, three had full-time jobs, three were students, one worked occasionally, and nineteen were not working. Participants who remained on, or completed, their LAIB treatment reported ongoing work and education or new work-seeking activities, temporary/part-time work, or volunteering. Participants who discontinued LAIB did not start any new education, training or work during their time in the study. Most participants wanted to work but identified barriers to employment and little help with job-seeking. Participants confirmed that LAIB facilitated employment because they did not have to attend pharmacies so often and felt physically and psychologically more able to work. Nonetheless, they sometimes felt unwell after initiating LAIB, which interrupted work and study and made them reluctant to reduce their LAIB treatment later. Conclusion: LAIB may help drug treatment patients who are interested in securing employment or achieving broader employment-related outcomes, such as education, training and volunteering. However, patients receiving LAIB may also need personalized employment support to assist them with wider barriers to working.

Indexed as

employmentLAIBlong-acting injectable buprenorphineopioidsqualitativesubstance use disordertreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40860494
PMCPMC12375321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.