ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Short-term outcomes of chest wall resections.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chest wall resections (CWRs) pose a unique challenge for a thoracic surgeon by virtue of the complexities involved in maintaining anatomical integrity and functional dynamics of the region. We aimed at studying the outcomes of CWR from the thoracic surgery unit of a comprehensive cancer care centre located in a tier 2 city in India. Methods: This is a retrospective study of all CWRs from our centre, between 15 January 2019 to 15 January 2025. Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained surgical database and electronic medical records. Results: A total of 12 cases were identified who underwent CWR in the said duration, and the majority were for sarcoma (5/12, 41.6%). Rib resections were needed in 10/12 (83.3%) cases, with the 3rd rib (5/12, 41.6%) being the most commonly resected; and multiple rib resections were needed in 7/12 (58.3%) patients. Mesh repair was used in the majority of patients for reconstruction (10/12, 83.3%). No major perioperative morbidity was observed in any of the patients in the first 30 days of surgery. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence for safe CWR being feasible at a low-volume thoracic surgical unit in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.