ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Influence of irrigating solutions on the hydration of calcium silicate-based dental biomaterials: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of interactions between sealers and irrigants on the physicochemical and surface characteristics of endodontic sealers.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Effect of dentine moisture conditions on interfacial adaptation of a calcium silicate-based sealer compared with an epoxy resin-based sealer: an SEM/EDX analysis.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers exhibit biocompatibility and bioactivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the influence of irrigating solutions on the hydration property of tricalcium silicate-based sealers. Methods: In an in vitro model, each group of sealer cylinders, Group 1 (Dia-Root Bio Sealer) and Group 2 (CeraSeal), was divided into four subgroups (n = 22) based on the irrigating solutions: Subgroup A, 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (Parcan, Septodont, France); Subgroup B, combination of NaOCl and etidronic acid (EA) (Twin Kleen, Maarc Dental, India); Subgroup C, chitosan-based endo-radiopaque solution (CERS) (Patented product, India); and Subgroup D, normal saline (negative control). Each sample was covered in a gauze soaked with 20 mL of irrigating solutions for 30 min. Samples were examined for morphology using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy, for phases formed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and for calcium ion release using inductively coupled plasma technique. Results: The irrigating solutions influenced the hydration property of the bioceramic sealers used, and different amounts of calcium ions were seen in each group. Samples immersed in CERS and saline released considerably more calcium, which was significantly higher ( Conclusion: CERS positively influenced the bioactivity of tricalcium silicate-based sealers. CeraSeal leached more calcium ions than Dia-Root Bio Sealer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.