ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Influence of irrigants on "bond strength" of "Bio-C Repair and TheraCal LC" in "perforation repair:" An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of different irrigation regimen on sealability and push-out bond strength of biodentine when used for repair of furcal perforation in mandibular permanent molars: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Sample size calculation practices in original research articles of the Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (2021-2025).Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Outcome of an Extensive Mid-Root Perforation With Unintentional Bioceramic Extrusion: A Case Report With 2-Year Recall Using CBCT.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: "Furcation perforation" is a procedural mishap that can compromise endodontic success. An ideal repair material must exhibit strong "dislodgment resistance." Irrigants used during biomechanical preparation may affect the "push-out bond strength (POBS)" of these materials. This study assessed the effect of "2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and etidronic acid (HEBP)" on the "dislodgment resistance" of "Bio-C Repair" and "TheraCal LC." Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the "POBS" of "Bio-C Repair and TheraCal LC" used for "furcation perforation repair" under the influence of different irrigants. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six extracted human mandibular molars were standardized and furcal perforations were created. Teeth were assigned into two main groups based on the repair material (Bio-C Repair or TheraCal LC) and subdivided into three subgroups ( Results: "TheraCal LC" demonstrated significantly higher bond strength than "Bio-C Repair" across all irrigants. CHX significantly reduced bond strength in "Bio-C Repair" compared to "TheraCal LC" ( Conclusion: "TheraCal LC" showed superior dislodgment resistance compared to "Bio-C Repair" even after exposure to various irrigants. HEBP enhanced the "bond strength" of "Bio-C Repair" and appears to be a compatible irrigant for use with calcium silicate-based repair materials. Further research is required to investigate the long-term chemical and structural effects of irrigants on these materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.