ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Comparative evaluation of stress distribution in maxillary premolar restored with onlay fabricated with different restorative materials - A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fracture patterns in endodontically treated teeth restored with or without horizontal fiber posts: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Article
- Biomechanical Evaluation of CAD/CAM Inlay Restorations Through Experimental Flexural Strength Testing and Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Review
- The influence of dental cavity on biomechanical stress and strain distribution: A finite element analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Saving the split: An umbrella review on therapeutic approaches for cracked tooth syndrome.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Review
- Evaluation of fracture resistance in a single rooted mandibular first premolar following access opening with ARenetoJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate stress distribution in maxillary premolar onlay fabricated of four different restorations. Methodology: A three-dimensional (3D) maxillary premolar model of onlay was simulated using SolidWorks software. The fabricated 3D onlay model was then restored using four different restorative materials, namely fiber-reinforced direct composite, indirect composite, pressable ceramic, and zirconia using the parameters of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio. The models were subjected to an axial load of 200 N. Von Mises stresses and strains were calculated. The highest stresses and strains generated in four different restorative materials were observed when subjected to vertical force on the palatal cusp, one on each marginal ridge, and one on the central fossa. Results: Maximum von Mises stresses generated with indirect composite, direct composite, IPS Empress ceramic, and zirconia onlay were 453.83 MPa, 441.36 MPa, 376.82 MPa, and 368.82 MPa, respectively, in the maxillary premolar onlay group. Conclusion: The results concluded that zirconia is a preferred choice of material for complex premolar cavities due to its superior stress distribution, enhancing durability, and protecting tooth structure. Conversely, composites may elevate failure risk under occlusal loads in large cavities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.