ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Evaluating the interaction of local anesthetic agents with sequential and continuous chelation in root dentin - An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of laser-assisted and intrapulpal local anesthesia for intra- and postoperative pain management in mandibular molars: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- A comparative clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of lignocaine 2% and articaine 4% for anesthesia of mandibular first molars with irreversible pulpitis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Adequate anesthesia is imperative to perform root canal treatment. In teeth that do not respond to conventional anesthetic procedures, intrapulpal injection of local anesthetics (LAs) is commonly performed. It remains unknown if these anesthetic solutions interact with irrigants that are subsequently used during root canal preparation. This study aimed to investigate if LA solution when interacting with endodontic irrigants forms debris. Materials and Methods: Sixteen single-rooted human mandibular premolars were used. Access opening was done and intrapulpal anesthesia was delivered. In Groups I and III, 2% Lignocaine HCl; Group II and IV, 4% Articaine HCl. Cleaning and shaping were done with Protaper gold and irrigants of the following groups: Group I and II: 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); Group II and IV: NaOCl + 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP). Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis was done. Results: SEM analysis showed the least debris formation in samples treated with 2% Lignocaine + sequential irrigation in all the three regions. Apical third has more amount of debris with a significant difference. Conclusions: Debris formation was lesser with 2% Lignocaine using sequential irrigation (NaOCl and EDTA) compared to continuous chelation (NaOCl + HEDP). Regardless of the irrigation protocol, 4% articaine resulted in greater debris accumulation than 2% lignocaine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.