Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860373›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025

Effect of newer all-in-one irrigants on root dentin wettability and surface roughness - An

Rahul Halkai, Vidyananda, Kiran R Halkai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rahul HalkaiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al-Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
VidyanandaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al-Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Kiran R HalkaiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Al-Badar Rural Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: All-in-one irrigants introduced recently claim to impart added benefits for endodontic disinfection; however, their effects on root dentin need to be evaluated. Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the dentinal wettability and surface roughness of Triton and Twin Kleen irrigating solutions on root dentin. Materials and Methods: Eighty dentin blocks (6 mm × 6 mm) were prepared using middle root portion obtained by horizontal sectioning of forty single-rooted extracted human mandibular premolar teeth which were further mounted in acrylic blocks (4 cm × 4 cm) and were randomly allotted into four groups (n = 20) and subjected to 10 ml of experimental irrigating solutions for 5 min as follows, group 1: normal saline (Control), group 2: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) +17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), group 3: Triton, and group 4: Twin Kleen. Half of the specimens in each group (n = 10) were tested for wettability by using goniometer, and another half (n = 10) were subjected to surface roughness using atomic force microscopy. Statistical Analysis: One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test ( Results: Group 3 exhibited the highest wettability followed by group 4, group 2 and least in group 1 (control group). Surface roughness was found to be highest in group 2 followed by group 3, group 4 and least in group 1. Conclusion: Triton and Twin Kleen have shown better wettability and less surface roughness compared to 17% EDTA and 5.25% NaOCl.

Indexed as

Atomic force microscopycontact anglesurface roughnessTritonTwin Kleenwettability

Identifiers

PMID40860373
PMCPMC12377664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.