ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Effect of newer all-in-one irrigants on root dentin wettability and surface roughness - An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluation of the effect of novel all-in-one irrigating solutions with and without diode laser activation on the radicular dentine composition: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Sample size calculation practices in original research articles of the Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (2021-2025).Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: All-in-one irrigants introduced recently claim to impart added benefits for endodontic disinfection; however, their effects on root dentin need to be evaluated. Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the dentinal wettability and surface roughness of Triton and Twin Kleen irrigating solutions on root dentin. Materials and Methods: Eighty dentin blocks (6 mm × 6 mm) were prepared using middle root portion obtained by horizontal sectioning of forty single-rooted extracted human mandibular premolar teeth which were further mounted in acrylic blocks (4 cm × 4 cm) and were randomly allotted into four groups (n = 20) and subjected to 10 ml of experimental irrigating solutions for 5 min as follows, group 1: normal saline (Control), group 2: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) +17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), group 3: Triton, and group 4: Twin Kleen. Half of the specimens in each group (n = 10) were tested for wettability by using goniometer, and another half (n = 10) were subjected to surface roughness using atomic force microscopy. Statistical Analysis: One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test ( Results: Group 3 exhibited the highest wettability followed by group 4, group 2 and least in group 1 (control group). Surface roughness was found to be highest in group 2 followed by group 3, group 4 and least in group 1. Conclusion: Triton and Twin Kleen have shown better wettability and less surface roughness compared to 17% EDTA and 5.25% NaOCl.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.