ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Case Report: Application of controlled pericardial drainage in type A aortic dissection complicated by cardiac tamponade.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) complicated by cardiac tamponade represents a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency. Acute pericardial effusion can severely compromise cardiac function. Although emergent surgical repair remains the gold standard, preoperative hemodynamic instability substantially increases surgical risk. Controlled pericardial drainage (CPD) has been proposed as a bridging intervention to rapidly relieve tamponade symptoms while mitigating the complications associated with excessive drainage. However, its clinical utility remains controversial because of concerns that the elevation in post-drainage blood pressure may accelerate dissection progression or trigger rupture. This case report highlights the successful use of CPD to stabilize a patient with TAAD and cardiac tamponade, facilitating a safe transition to definitive surgery. It also discusses the clinical utility of this strategy. Case presentation: A 48-year-old man presented to the emergency department with an acute onset of altered mental status lasting 50 min. Bedside ultrasound and aortic computed tomography angiography confirmed a TAAD diagnosis complicated by pericardial tamponade. After the examination, the patient experienced sudden hypotension, which was promptly managed with emergency CPD, resulting in rapid stabilization of blood pressure. Subsequently, the patient underwent "Sun's procedure" and artificial vascular replacement, during which 500 mL of pericardial blood was extracted. The patient recovered well and was discharged 24 days after the surgery. Conclusion: With rigorous hemodynamic monitoring and a multidisciplinary framework, CPD effectively functions as a preoperative stabilization approach in patients with TAAD complicated by pericardial tamponade, securing valuable time for subsequent surgical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.