Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860325›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

Oceanic states of consciousness-an existential-neuroscience perspective.

Human-Friedrich Unterrainer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Human-Friedrich UnterrainerFaculty of Psychotherapy Science, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oceanic states of consciousness-characterized by ego dissolution, unity, and timelessness-have long occupied a liminal space between psychopathology and transcendence. This paper explores these states through the interdisciplinary lens of existential neuroscience, integrating insights from psychoanalysis, existentialism, affective neuroscience, and psychedelic research. Starting with the psychoanalytic tension between Freud's view of the oceanic feeling as a regressive illusion and Jung's framing of it as a transformative encounter with the unconscious, this paper examines how creative and mystical experiences often arise from this dissolution of self-boundaries. Drawing on art theorist Anton Ehrenzweig and examples from figures like Vincent van Gogh and Antonin Artaud, I highlight how oceanic states may catalyze both visionary insight and psychological disintegration. Neuroscientific models, including the REBUS theory and studies of the Default Mode Network (DMN), suggest that ego dissolution reflects a flexible reorganization of brain function rather than dysfunction. The Peri-Aqueductal Gray (PAG), a midbrain structure associated with affect regulation and spiritual experience, emerges as a key neural hub linking primal affective states with mystical awareness. Existential thinkers such as Sartre, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty provide a philosophical framework for interpreting these phenomena as moments of existential rupture and potential authenticity. Oceanic states thus challenge conventional notions of the self as fixed and bounded. Rather than categorizing them as pathological or purely mystical, it is proposed here that these states represent affectively charged boundary experiences - ones that require contextual integration and offer deep insight into the nature of selfhood, meaning, and transformation.

Indexed as

affective neuroscienceego dissolutionexistential neurosciencemysticismoceanic feelingpsychedelic therapypsychoanalysis

Identifiers

PMID40860325
PMCPMC12375664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.