ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
The study of multisensory interception for interaction with objects and others in visually impaired children.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interception refers to goal-directed motor actions aimed at interacting with moving objects and is essential for both motor co-ordination and social engagement. In childhood, interceptive skills support environmental exploration, peer interaction, and participation in play and sports. For children with visual impairments, the lack of visual cues compromises the development of these skills, potentially limiting motor competence and opportunities for social interaction. Despite its clinical and developmental relevance, research on interception in visually impaired (VI) children is extremely limited. This mini review synthesizes findings from studies on interceptive skills in VI adults, as well as in sighted and VI children. We discuss how vision contributes to interceptive actions, and how alternative sensory pathways can compensate in its absence. We highlight major limitations of current literature, including poor ecological validity, a lack of longitudinal data, and scarce attention to multisensory and social aspects. To address these gaps, we propose future research directions that include cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, multisensory paradigms, and the use of virtual reality technologies to simulate naturalistic environments. These approaches may inform inclusive and rehabilitative interventions that support the motor and social development of VI children through accessible, engaging, and developmentally appropriate interceptive experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.