ArticleClinical practice in pediatric psychology2025
Not a Trainee, Not Yet Mid-Career: Navigating being an Early Career Pediatric Psychologist.
Article in Clinical practice in pediatric psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The American Psychological Association (APA) defines early career (EC) status as occurring in the 10 years following earning a doctorate. As EC pediatric and behavioral health psychologists (ECPP) who work with and conduct research with adolescents and young adults (AYA), we have noted that our own and our peers' experiences during this career phase have mirrored that of our AYA research participants and patients. Namely, no longer scaffolded by training milestones and supervision, yet still often viewed as green, EC psychologists may often feel and be treated like they are experiencing a career-based emerging adulthood. Despite the presence of some institutional support during this career phase, we and our peers have found difficulty in navigating this career phase-something compounded by concurrent life events (e.g., parenting, pandemic). Method: Grounded in our own current and recent histories, this Commentary provides examples of common experiences across the EC--from fellowship to nearing mid-career. Results: To improve the EC experience for pediatric psychologists and beyond, recommendations are made at the institutional, mentor, and ECPP-levels. Conclusions: Given the risks for burnout during this phase of career, when workforce demands are at all-time high, this Commentary aims to draw attention to the developmental norms of EC and to improve the EC experience for pediatric psychologists and our peers. The hope is that in doing so, pediatric patients and their families may be better served via a well-supported EC workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.