Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860251›Full record

ReviewPsoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Biosimilars for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis.

Paolo Gisondi, Francesco Bellinato, Tea Curic, Giampiero Girolomoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paolo GisondiDepartment of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1777-9001
Francesco BellinatoDepartment of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Tea CuricDepartment of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giampiero GirolomoniDepartment of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-0493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting over 60 million adults and children worldwide and can occur at any age, from childhood to adulthood. If the patient has a diffuse form of psoriasis, affecting more than ten percent of the body surface, or involving sensitive areas such as the face, scalp, nails, and/or palmoplantar region, he or she is a candidate for systemic therapy. Currently, several drugs are approved for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis in Europe and US. These are classified into conventional systemics, biologics, and small molecules. These immunomodulatory agents are available in different forms of administration, such as oral, subcutaneous, and intravenous. Novel treatments, including biologics and small molecules, can provide reliable disease control with a good safety profile even in the long term and have greatly improved the quality of life for many patients. Nevertheless, biologics can be expensive, placing a significant burden on national healthcare systems and creating a barrier to access for patients in need of these life-changing therapies. A biosimilar drug is a biologic medical product that is highly similar to an already approved reference biologic drug (also known as the originator). Biosimilars have no clinically meaningful differences in terms of safety, purity, and efficacy compared to the reference product. Biosimilar drugs have been on the market-and therefore in clinical practice-for several years now, helping to overcome these challenges. Biosimilars have the potential to improve access to biologic therapies for psoriasis while reducing healthcare costs. The aim of this narrative review is to describe biosimilars and the potential cost-saving benefits their use can offer. In this review, we will discuss adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, and ustekinumab, as well as their corresponding biosimilars.

Indexed as

biologicsbiosimilarscostoriginatorpsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID40860251
PMCPMC12372828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.