ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Chronosequence Resampling Elucidates Tree Community and Forest Structure Recovery Patterns in Restored Tropical Rainforest.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chronosequence Resampling Elucidates Tree Community and Forest Structure Recovery Patterns in Restored Tropical Rainforest.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest restoration is an essential tool for conserving biodiversity in tropical regions; yet, restoration outcomes in the Afrotropics remain largely understudied. Here, we investigated how the forest structure, tree diversity, community, life-history traits and habitat associations recovered over three decades of active restoration in an East African rainforest in Uganda. The vegetation surveys were initially conducted in 2013 and repeated in 2021. Altogether, the study included 45 actively restored forest sites (aged 4-26 years) and 10 primary forest reference sites. The results showed increased tree taxa richness, basal area, tree height and community similarity (i.e., the similarity of community composition of restored forests to the composition of primary forest) along the age gradient. After 20 years of planting, Simpson's diversity and canopy cover reached similar values recorded in the reference primary forest. In contrast, restored forests had not attained levels of tree taxa richness, basal area, stem density, or community similarity comparable to those of the reference primary forest within three decades. We found an age gradient from younger restored to older restored to the primary forest in the composition of tree communities. The proportion of species with animal-dispersed seeds was similar in the restored and the primary forest. The proportion of shade-tolerant and forest-interior species had increased along the age gradient in the 2021 survey. In conclusion, forest structure, diversity and community showed early signs of recovery, but the rate of change slowed over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.