ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Objective assessment of gait and posture symptoms in Parkinson's disease using wearable sensors and machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Biomarkers for Early Detection and Monitoring of Neurological Disorders: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-Enabled Wearables for Motor Function Assessment and Rehabilitation in Parkinson Disease: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Gait and posture symptoms-such as gait impairments, postural instability, and posture deformations-are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and closely linked to falls. Traditional assessments using clinical scales are time-consuming and prone to subjective bias. This study aims to predict the severity of gait and posture symptoms using data collected from wearable sensors during a single laboratory-based walking assessment, providing an objective, efficient, and automated evaluation approach. Methods: Sensor-based gait parameters were collected from 225 PD participants (mean age 63.15 ± 10.46 years) through a standardized walking assessment. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (80%) and an independent test set (20%) with balanced age, sex, and PD duration. Two machine learning models-extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and support vector machine (SVM)-were trained to predict scores for five gait and posture items (#3.9-3.13) from the MDS-UPDRS III. Results: XGBoost was chosen as the final model due to its better performance than SVM. Across all five gait and posture items, the models achieved over 80% acceptable accuracy. For items #3.9-#3.11, absolute accuracy surpassed 70%, and macro-F1 scores were above 0.60 in leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The model's performance on the independent test set matched LOOCV results, confirming robustness. A total of 35, 35, 30, 30, and 40 gait features were selected for the predictive models of items #3.9-#3.13, respectively. Among these, key features with significant clinical relevance were identified. For example, Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using wearable sensor data to objectively assess gait and posture symptoms in PD. Though conducted in a clinical setting, the approach may support clinicians through consistent assessments and more frequent monitoring, with potential for future home-based use to enable longitudinal symptom tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.