ArticleInternational journal of surgery protocols2025
Optimizing tDCS parameters for post-stroke upper limb recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in International journal of surgery protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability globally, with significant impairments in upper limb motor function affecting the quality of life of survivors. Despite the potential of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a noninvasive neuromodulation technique for enhancing post-stroke recovery, current findings regarding its efficacy and optimal parameters remain heterogeneous and controversial. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the effects of different tDCS parameters on upper limb motor impairments in stroke patients and provide guidance for selecting optimal stimulation parameters via a meta-analysis of available literature. Methods: A comprehensive literature search (up to 31 December 2024) will be conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data to gather relevant data on tDCS interventions for post-stroke upper limb impairments. We will use EndNote 21 software for study selection and Stata 16.0 software for data analysis. Studies included will be randomized controlled trials involving adult stroke patients receiving tDCS interventions, with primary outcomes focusing on upper limb motor function scores and secondary outcomes including activities of daily living and adverse events. Results: This study aims to provide the most up-to-date evidence and recommendations for clinicians and stroke patients to choose an optimal type of tDCS intervention. It will elucidate the impact of different stimulation parameters (e.g., current density, stimulation duration, and target location) on therapeutic outcomes. Conclusion: tDCS has the potential to positively impact upper limb motor function in stroke patients. This study will provide insights into optimal stimulation parameters, encouraging the integration of tDCS into clinical rehabilitation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.