Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2025

Damage processes in extended laser exposures using an

Nathaniel J Pope, Jin Ha, Madeline E Melzer, Priscilla Lopez, Amanda Tijerina, Gary D Noojin, Michael L Denton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathaniel J PopeBiosciences Department, Science Applications International Corporation, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States.
Jin HaRosenberg School of Optometry, University of Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Madeline E MelzerDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Priscilla LopezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Amanda TijerinaBioResearch, Conceptual MindWorks, Inc., San Antonio, TX, United States.
Gary D NoojinBioeffects Division, Air Force Research Lab, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States.
Michael L DentonBioeffects Division, Air Force Research Lab, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells are sensitive to both photothermal and photochemical damage when exposed to lasers with wavelengths associated with the retinal blue light hazard. Laser power density (irradiance) and exposure duration primarily dictate the damage mechanism. Relatively high irradiances and short exposure durations typically lead to melanin-dependent photothermal damage, whereas low irradiance and long duration exposures are required for photochemical pathways. However, little is known about damage mechanisms at intermediate irradiances and durations for pigmented cells. The current Z136.1-2022 laser safety standard from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) does not consider combined photothermal and photochemical damage processes. In addition, the ANSI Z136.1 standard classifies photochemical damage as nonthermal. Here, we use extended laser exposure parameters in an

Indexed as

concurrent exposuresirradiance reciprocitylasermicrothermographyphotochemicalphotothermalProbit thresholdRPE cell damage

Identifiers

PMID40860175
PMCPMC12370482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.