ArticleChildren and youth services review2025
Promoting Work-Related Well-Being of After-School Staff Via Effectiveness and Connectedness: A Mixed Method Study.
Article in Children and youth services review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current study examined associations between effectiveness supporting youth, connectedness with colleagues, and work-related well-being among after-school providers. We used a mixed method approach to gain an in-depth understanding of how effectiveness and connectedness may contribute to provider well-being. Participating after-school providers (n=34) completed a survey examining different aspects of effectiveness supporting youth (i.e., comfort promoting youth social-emotional outcomes, closeness or conflict with youth, ability to engage youth in programming), connectedness with colleagues (i.e., social support and social capital), and work-related well-being (i.e., work engagement, satisfaction, burnout, and stress). A subset of staff (n=11) also completed a follow-up interview to explore their experience of and self-identified facilitators and barriers to their effectiveness supporting youth, connectedness with colleagues, and work-related well-being. We used quantification of qualitative data and integrated data tables to consolidate qualitative and quantitative findings. Effectiveness supporting youth served as the most consistent predictor of work-related well-being across qualitative and quantitative data, including the capacity to build close and positive relationships with youth, engage youth in programming, and promote youth social emotional development. However, some providers also reported emotional fatigue from supporting youth experiencing stressful events, particularly in the absence of adequate resources and support from colleagues. Connectedness across colleagues was identified as a stressor when inadequate or ineffective support or communication was noted, but also as a buffer against stress for providers reporting sufficient and effective support and communication. Effective communication, bidirectional support relationships, and bonding social capital (e.g., trust and shared goals) were the most salient aspects of connectedness associated with positive work-related well-being. The current study illustrates pathways in which effectiveness and connectedness can promote or hinder work-related well-being among after-school providers, particularly the importance of building positive and effective relationships across staff and with youth while creating supportive work environments that include access to necessary resources for addressing youth needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.