ArticleRSC advances2025
A method for efficient separation of polystyrene nanoplastics and its application in natural freshwater.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoplastics (NPs) are an emerging contaminant in natural freshwater environments. However, there is a lack of analytical methods for separating and characterizing NPs by particle size, which is essential for analyzing their environmental behavior. Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) is considered a reliable technique suitable for separating and characterizing the particle size of macromolecules, colloids, and particles. In this work, we report a method for separating and characterizing the size of polystyrene nanoplastics (PS NPs) in freshwater environments using AF4 coupled with MALS and UV-vis detectors. By optimizing the injection volume, mobile phase composition, cross-flow rate, and detector flow rate, we achieved the separation of 50 nm and 100 nm PS NPs within 40 min. The average mass recovery rate reached 88.5%, with relative standard deviations of less than 10% for different indicators in repeated measurements. The
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.