Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40860018›Full record

ReviewNational science review2025

Machine learning for estimation and control of quantum systems.

Hailan Ma, Bo Qi, Ian R Petersen, Re-Bing Wu, Herschel Rabitz, Daoyi Dong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimal control of spin systems.Science advances · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Progress in quantum information.National science review · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hailan MaSchool of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Bo QiState Key Laboratory of Mathematical Sciences, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-0124
Ian R PetersenSchool of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Re-Bing WuCenter for Intelligent and Networked Systems, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Herschel RabitzDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Daoyi DongAustralian Artificial Intelligence Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-3559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement of quantum technologies depends on the ability to create and manipulate increasingly complex quantum systems, with critical applications in quantum computation, quantum simulation and quantum sensing. These developments present substantial challenges in efficient control, calibration and verification of quantum systems. Machine learning methods have emerged as powerful tools owing to their remarkable capability to learn from data, and have thus been extensively utilized for various quantum tasks. This paper reviews several significant topics at the intersection of machine learning and quantum estimation and control. Specifically, we discuss neural network-based approaches for quantum state estimation, gradient-based methods for quantum optimal control, evolutionary computation for learning control of quantum systems, machine learning techniques for quantum robust control and reinforcement learning for adaptive quantum control.

Indexed as

machine learningneural networkquantum controlquantum estimationquantum measurementreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID40860018
PMCPMC12371192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.