ArticleNational science review2025
Synergizing a knowledge graph and large language model for relay catalysis pathway recommendation.
Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Sustainable Synthesis of Bio-Based Furanic Compounds Via Chemical, Biological, Chemobiological and Other Combination Approach in Benign Systems.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Understanding Fundamental Principles of Catalysis.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026Review
- Advancing battery failure diagnosis by knowledge-augmented large language models.National science review · 2026Article
- Bridging data and discovery: a survey on knowledge graphs in AI for science.National science review · 2026Review
- Automating structure-activity analysis for electrochemical nitrogen reduction catalyst design through multi-agent collaborations.National science review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relay catalysis integrates multiple catalytic reactions to efficiently transform intermediates and enhance conversion and selectivity. However, designing these pathways and multifunctional catalysts is often lengthy and costly, heavily relying on in-depth literature analysis by experienced researchers. To address this, we developed an approach that combines a knowledge graph (KG) and large language models (LLMs) to automatically recommend multistep catalytic reaction pathways. Our method involves using an LLM-assisted workflow for data acquisition and organization, followed by the construction of a detailed catalysis knowledge graph (Cat-KG). After querying the Cat-KG, promising relay catalysis pathways are identified by applying scoring rules informed by expertise in relay catalysis. The LLM then transforms the structured pathways and reaction condition data into readable chemical equations and descriptions for chemists. This step integrates catalysis knowledge from the Cat-KG and helps avoid LLM-induced hallucinations by using reliable information. The method efficiently recommended relay catalysis pathways for ethylene, ethanol, 2,5-furandicarboxylate and other targets within minutes, identifying pathways consistent with reported ones while using different reaction conditions, validating its effectiveness. Thus, this strategy can extrapolate known and novel relay catalysis pathways, showcasing its potential for application in pathway selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.