Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859985›Full record

ArticleDrugs (Abingdon, England)2025

'I crave not to feel uncomfortable' - investigating craving for opioids and cannabis among individuals with chronic pain.

Johannes Thrul, Courtney D Nordeck, Janardan Devkota, Chung Jung Mun, Kelly E Dunn, Cecilia L Bergeria, Vadim Zipunnikov, Ryan Vandrey, Patrick H Finan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johannes ThrulDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg school of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8929-9579
Courtney D NordeckFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Janardan DevkotaDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg school of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chung Jung MunEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona state University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Kelly E DunnDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University school of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cecilia L BergeriaDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University school of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vadim ZipunnikovDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ryan VandreyDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University school of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Patrick H FinanDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University school of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

NIDA Epidemiology Training Program: Johns Hopkins UniversityT32DA007292 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RENEE M. JOHNSON, Brion S Maher · 1993 to 2026
$17.7M
Real Time Monitoring of Prescription Opioid and Cannabis Co-Use in Patients with Chronic PainR21DA048175 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI THRUL, JOHANNES · 2020 to 2021
$450k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA048175NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The assessment of drug craving is common in survey studies, including those using real-time data collection methods, such as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA). However, few studies investigate how participants with chronic pain interpret the word 'craving' and how interpretations impact survey responses. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study among 12 individuals with chronic pain who were using prescription opioids and cannabis. Participants completed baseline surveys, cognitive interviews, and 14-day smartphone-based EMA data collection. Analyses included deductive and inductive coding of interviews and t-tests of EMA self-reports of opioid and cannabis craving. Results: Four participants had negative reactions to the word 'craving', including mentions that these questions offended them. The remaining eight participants mentioned no negative connotation. EMA data showed that participants without negative reactions reported a greater range (opioids), higher standard deviation (opioids), and higher maximum (opioids, cannabis) on Likert-type EMA craving items, compared to those with a negative reaction. Conclusions: Some individuals with chronic pain may have a negative reaction to the word 'craving' related to opioid and cannabis use and this reaction may impact survey responses. Alternative wording of survey items is recommended, for example focused on 'wanting' or 'needing'.

Indexed as

cannabiscravingecological momentary assessmentmixed methodsOpioids

Identifiers

PMID40859985
PMCPMC12372989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.