Observational studyAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2025
Predictors of 30-Day Recurrent Emergency Department Visits for Hyperglycemia in Patients With Diabetes: A Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study.
Observational study in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidence and risk factors of hyperglycemic emergencies in adults with diabetes in the public hospitals in Harari region, Eastern Ethiopia.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIdentifying predictors of increased healthcare utilization for hyperglycemia may have important implications for designing interventions to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs. Studies examining predictors of 30-day recurrent ED hyperglycemia visits have been limited due to their retrospective nature. This study's objective was to prospectively identify predictors of 30-day recurrent ED visits for hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes.
methodsWe conducted a multicentre, prospective cohort study of adults ≥ 18 years at one of four Canadian tertiary care, academic EDs with a diagnosis of hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables independently associated with recurrent 30-day ED visits for hyperglycemia.
resultsWe enrolled 594 patients; 80 (13.5%) had a recurrent ED visit for hyperglycemia within 30 days. Independently associated predictors of 30-day recurrent visits on complete case analysis include substance abuse history (odds ratio [OR] 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-4.38) and initial laboratory blood glucose (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07), while a new diabetes diagnosis was negatively associated (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.09-0.94). Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data found the following independently associated variables: substance abuse history (OR 2.55, 95% CI: 1.34-4.85), previous ED visit within the past 14 days (OR 2.14, 95% CI: 1.02-4.48), and initial laboratory blood glucose (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07). Two variables were negatively associated: recent hospitalization within the past 30 days (OR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19-0.98) and new diabetes diagnosis (OR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.97).
conclusionsThis multicentre prospective study reports predictors independently associated with 30-day recurrent ED visits for hyperglycemia. These predictors should be considered by ED clinicians when making disposition and follow-up plans for this important patient population, and future interventions should explore the interaction between hyperglycemia and substance use to prevent recurrent ED visits and reduce healthcare system costs and utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.