ArticleCirculation research2025
RBPMS and RBPMS2 Cooperate to Safeguard Cardiac Splicing.
Article in Circulation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elucidating Gene Functions in Congenital Heart Disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMutations in cardiac SFs (splicing factors) cause cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease, underscoring the critical role of SFs in cardiac development and disease. Cardiac SFs are implicated to cooperatively regulate the splicing of essential cardiac genes, but the functional importance of their collaboration remains unclear. RBPMS (RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing) and RBPMS2 (RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing 2) are SFs involved in heart development and exhibit similar splicing regulatory activities in vitro, but it is unknown whether they cooperate to regulate splicing in vivo.
methods
resultsMice lacking both RBPMS and RBPMS2 in cardiomyocytes died before embryonic day 13.5 and developed sarcomere disarray, whereas
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that RBPMS and RBPMS2 work in concert to safeguard the splicing of genes essential for cardiac contraction, highlighting the importance of SF collaboration in maintaining cardiac splicing signature, which should be taken into consideration when devising future therapeutic approaches through modulating the activity of SFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.