Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859728›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025

Body oscillations couple with wing flapping to reduce aerodynamic power in wild silk moth flight.

Usama Bin Sikandar, Brett R Aiello, Simon Sponberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Usama Bin SikandarSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3335-5994
Brett R AielloSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9034-0460
Simon SponbergSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4942-4894

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific ResearchDunn Family EndowmentNSF Career Award - Division of PhysicsNSF PoLS SAVI Student Research Network
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects show diverse flight kinematics and morphologies reflecting their evolutionary histories and ecological adaptations. Many silk moths use low wingbeat frequencies and large wings to fly and display body oscillations. Their bodies pitch and bob periodically, synchronized with their wingbeat cycle. Similar oscillations in butterflies improve weight support and forward thrust while reducing flight power requirements. However, how instantaneous body and wing kinematics interact for these beneficial aerodynamic and power consequences is not well understood. We hypothesized that body oscillations affect aerodynamic power requirements by influencing wing rotation relative to the airflow. Using three-dimensional forward flight video recordings of four silk moth species and a quasi-steady blade-element aerodynamic model, we analysed the aerodynamic effects of body and wing kinematics. We find that the body pitch and wing sweep angles maintain a narrow range of phase differences, which enhances the angle of attack variation between each half-stroke due to increased wing rotation relative to the airflow. This redirects the aerodynamic force to increase the upward and forward components during the downstroke and upstroke, respectively, thus lowering overall drag without compromising weight support and forward thrust. Reducing energy expenditure is beneficial because many adult silk moths do not feed and rely on limited energy budgets.

Indexed as

Flight, AnimalModels, BiologicalWings, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical Phenomenaaerodynamicsblade-element modelflappingflightinsectwings

Identifiers

PMID40859728
PMCPMC12381587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.