ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Management of Hip Arthroplasty for Intertrochanteric Fractures Under the Treatment Concept of Periprosthetic Fractures.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management of Hip Arthroplasty for Intertrochanteric Fractures Under the Treatment Concept of Periprosthetic Fractures.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIntertrochanteric fractures (IF) in the elderly are often complicated by osteoporosis and high rates of fixation failure. Current treatment options have limitations in providing both stable fixation and early mobilization in this fragile population. This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a novel approach, the periprosthetic femoral fracture treatment concept (PFFtc), as a surgical strategy to guide hip arthroplasty in elderly IF patients.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 209 elderly patients (mean age: 81.6 years; range: 70-93) with IF who underwent hip arthroplasty using the PFFtc protocol between March 2014 and August 2021, comprising 133 females and 76 males. All patients underwent treatment with the "PFFtc" and were subsequently followed up at intervals of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and annually thereafter. Clinical parameters such as ASA anesthesia grading, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Harris Hip Scores (HHS), and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) outcomes were meticulously recorded. The subsidence of the femoral stem was assessed using Pelligrini's method, while mortality rates, postoperative complications, and patient's survival status post-discharge were systematically documented. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for postoperative complications.
resultsOver a mean follow-up of 38.5 ± 6.0 months, prosthesis subsidence averaged 2.2 mm and stabilized. No deaths occurred within 30 days postoperatively. The 1- and 2-year cumulative mortality rates were 4.3% and 11%, respectively. The most common complications included DVT and urinary tract infections. Logistic regression identified hypoproteinemia (OR = 2.38, p = 0.032) and heart disease (OR = 2.74, p = 0.012) as independent risk factors for postoperative complications. At final follow-up, the mean VAS was 1.1 ± 1.0, HHS was 89.4 ± 3.9, PCS was 53.2 ± 8.5, and MCS was 50.5 ± 6.7. Among surviving patients, 63.0% lived independently at home.
conclusionThe PFFtc-guided arthroplasty approach appears to be a safe and effective option for managing IF in elderly patients. It provides stable fixation and functional recovery of prostheses and muscles and offers a promising alternative to traditional fixation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.