ArticleCancer science2025
Nationwide Real-World Usage of Blood-Based (Liquid) Biomarker Testing in Japan.
Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observed ALK fusion/rearrangement frequency across comprehensive genomic profiling platforms in Japanese routine oncology practice.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Implementation Benchmark of Tumor-Agnostic Eligibility Signals Across Routine Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Platforms in Japan: A Nationwide C-CAT Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the advances in precision oncology through biomarker testing, not all patients are able to benefit from treatment decisions guided by tissue-based testing like comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, the application and integration of liquid biopsy testing into clinical practice has not been fully defined in Japan. Clinical records were retrieved from the data repository of the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) in Japan. All records related to FoundationOne Liquid tests were evaluated from the database's inception in June 2019 to June 2023. Outcomes of interest included treatment patterns before and after testing, as well as mutations of interest. The seven most frequent tumor types (pancreas, prostate, biliary tract, bowel, lung, stomach and ovary) were stratified as part of subgroup analyses. Of 7461 patient records, the most prevalent cancers were pancreatic (24.5%), prostate (15.8%), and biliary tract (11.2%) cancers. Following molecular tumor board (MTB) review, 5.8% of cases received new treatments, predominantly targeted therapy (41.7%) and chemotherapy (40.9%), with 2.1% participating in clinical trials. Median durations from specimen collection to post-MTB treatment were 63 days. Tests for patients with bowel cancer (70/796; 8.8%) and lung cancer (57/695; 8.2%) received genotype-matched treatment most frequently, followed by tests for patients with prostate cancer (92/1182; 7.8%). Access to CGP in Japan appears more limited compared to other high-income countries. While CGP may be valuable for certain cancers, such as bowel, biliary, and prostate cancer, its benefit for other cancer types remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.