Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859668›Full record

ArticleJournal of texture studies2025

In Vitro Robotic Chewing Studies of Food Texture Changes During Mastication.

Xudong Wang, Bangxiang Chen, Jaspreet Dhupia, Macro Morgenstern, Weiliang Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of texture studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xudong WangDepartment of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-8796
Bangxiang ChenDepartment of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7508-8743
Jaspreet DhupiaDepartment of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Macro MorgensternNew Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Weiliang XuDepartment of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate food texture changes during mastication using a robotic chewing system. Roasted peanuts and white bread were used as representative food samples to explore how different chewing behaviors affect textural transformations. Initially, the number of cycles required to chew each food sample for swallowing was recorded through in vivo experiments. Subsequently, various molar chewing trajectories, occlusal forces, and artificial saliva flow rates were applied in the robotic chewing system to simulate a range of chewing behaviors. Each food type was chewed by the robot for 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the total determined number of chewing cycles. Nine food texture variables were measured using texture profile analysis (TPA). Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) were employed to assess the correlations between chewing behaviors and food texture changes. Results showed that for roasted peanuts, hardness, adhesive force, and cohesiveness had strong correlations with chewing cycles, while for white bread, these relationships were less pronounced. The mechanisms underlying the texture changes were analyzed and explained. For roasted peanuts, texture changes were primarily governed by chewing stages, with an average hardness reduction of 81.5% over the chewing process. Springiness and its index were mainly influenced by saliva secretion rate. Conversely, white bread initially exhibited increased hardness due to compression, followed by gradual softening. Its adhesive force was chiefly impacted by saliva secretion, while cohesiveness was more strongly affected by chewing trajectory. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, as the limited and homogeneous participant sample restricts their broader applicability.

Indexed as

FoodMasticationRoboticsAdultArachisBreadDeglutitionFemaleHardnessHumansMalePrincipal Component AnalysisSalivaYoung Adultchewing behaviorsfood texture changemasticationrobotic chewing

Identifiers

PMID40859668
PMCPMC12381518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.