ArticleJournal of texture studies2025
In Vitro Robotic Chewing Studies of Food Texture Changes During Mastication.
Article in Journal of texture studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food characterization in the omics era: current advances, analytical approaches, and future perspectives.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- In Vitro Robotic Chewing Studies of Food Texture Changes During Mastication.Journal of texture studies · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate food texture changes during mastication using a robotic chewing system. Roasted peanuts and white bread were used as representative food samples to explore how different chewing behaviors affect textural transformations. Initially, the number of cycles required to chew each food sample for swallowing was recorded through in vivo experiments. Subsequently, various molar chewing trajectories, occlusal forces, and artificial saliva flow rates were applied in the robotic chewing system to simulate a range of chewing behaviors. Each food type was chewed by the robot for 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the total determined number of chewing cycles. Nine food texture variables were measured using texture profile analysis (TPA). Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) were employed to assess the correlations between chewing behaviors and food texture changes. Results showed that for roasted peanuts, hardness, adhesive force, and cohesiveness had strong correlations with chewing cycles, while for white bread, these relationships were less pronounced. The mechanisms underlying the texture changes were analyzed and explained. For roasted peanuts, texture changes were primarily governed by chewing stages, with an average hardness reduction of 81.5% over the chewing process. Springiness and its index were mainly influenced by saliva secretion rate. Conversely, white bread initially exhibited increased hardness due to compression, followed by gradual softening. Its adhesive force was chiefly impacted by saliva secretion, while cohesiveness was more strongly affected by chewing trajectory. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, as the limited and homogeneous participant sample restricts their broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.