ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Effect of static stretching duration on modulation of H-reflex and tendon-reflex excitability of the soleus muscle in young men.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuromuscular electrical stimulation affects the change in stretch tolerance by static stretching.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Effect of Low-Load, Long-Duration Stretching on Pain and Mobility in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.Cureus · 2026Article
- Acute neuromechanical effects of static and PNF hamstring stretching on explosive power and balance.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Effect of static stretching duration on modulation of H-reflex and tendon-reflex excitability of the soleus muscle in young men.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stretching-induced impairments of muscle performance are attributed to neural adaptations and mechanical changes. Inhibition of muscle spindle sensitivity appears to have long-lasting effects after stretching. However, whether a dose-response relationship exists between stretching duration and muscle spindle sensitivity remains unclear. The present study aimed to reveal the effect of static stretching duration on modulation of muscle spindle sensitivity in the soleus muscle. The present study used data obtained from 19 young men. Static stretching intervention involved five 1-min stretches with 1-min intervals between stretches under maximal dorsiflexion. The Hoffmann-reflex (H-reflex) and tendon-reflex (T-reflex) were recorded from the soleus before and during stretching, at intervals between stretching. Time-course changes in H-reflex and T-reflex amplitudes from baseline (i.e., before stretching) were calculated. The H-reflex amplitude depressed 51.5%-55.2% during static stretching, and these H-reflex depressions recovered in the interval following each stretch. T-reflex amplitudes depressed 71.2%-73.5% during static stretching, and these T-reflex depressions remained following each interval. Inhibitions of the T-reflex amplitude after the second to fifth stretches were not significantly stronger than that after the first static stretch. These results suggest that 1-min static stretching under maximal dorsiflexion achieves sufficient modulation of muscle spindle sensitivity of the soleus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.