ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman Disease in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (also known as Rosai-Dorfman disease [RDD]), was originally recognized in 1969 by Rosai and Dorfman. RDD is characterized by the accumulation of activated histiocytes in various tissues and organs, but most commonly in lymph nodes. RDD is subclassified into 2 forms. The more common form, nodal RDD, and the rare form, extranodal RDD, which is based on the presence of extranodal tissue involvement. Most extranodal RDD cases also involve lymph nodes. Primary, exclusively extranodal RDD is rare, and is exceedingly uncommon in young pediatric patients. These cases have rarely been reported in the medical literature. CASE REPORT This 16-month-old previously healthy boy presented with right-forearm pain, following a right-wrist injury. Imaging studies revealed an aggressive lesion of the distal radius with the presence of an adjacent soft-tissue component. The core-needle tissue biopsy suggested osteomyelitis. Because the patient was not responsive to antibiotics, he underwent curettage with washout for the management of presumed osteomyelitis. RDD was diagnosed based on the curettage material. Subsequent imaging studies confirmed the isolated right-radius bone lesion without any other organ or tissue involvement. He received observation management with surveillance imaging every 6 months. Thirty-six months later, he was healthy, without pain, and had normal right-wrist function. CONCLUSIONS Primary osseous RDD in children is exceedingly rare and can cause diagnostic challenges. Our case serves as a reminder that despite the diagnostic challenge, keeping RDD in the differential diagnosis, especially in young patients, can avoid misdiagnosis and mismanagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.