Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859411›Full record

ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health

Preparing Midwifery Students for the Certification Examination by Debunking Prevalent Test-Taking Myths.

Kendra Faucett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kendra FaucettVanderbilt School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-6843-7028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nationally, midwifery educators are often perplexed when graduates from their programs are not successful on the American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB) certification examination. Often, these students are excellent clinically and have a deep foundational knowledge. During examination reviews with professors, they may be able to explain a concept well orally but struggle to pick the correct answer. Emerging cognitive science can be applied to test-taking heuristics to better understand how students make choices on multiple-choice tests. Helping students understand and develop metacognition and using a trauma-informed pedagogy will give educators a new lens for teaching test-taking strategies. By applying a new method, midwifery educators can dispel common test-taking myths, help their students understand their cognitive bias when taking tests, and ultimately build students' confidence when approaching high-stakes tests. By changing their approach to test-taking advice, educators can help more students pass the certification on the first attempt and increase the speed at which new graduates are ready to enter the workforce.

Indexed as

CertificationEducational MeasurementMidwiferyStudents, NursingTest Taking SkillsClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansUnited Statescertification examcognitive psychologyheuristicsmetacognitionmidwifery educationquality improvementtest‐taking tips

Identifiers

PMID40859411
PMCPMC12716116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.