ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2025
Effect of change on psychological performance in rescue services personnel in Finland - a qualitative interview study.
Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRescue services work is in constant change, yet operational responsibilities in high-stakes, unpredictable environments remain. In this study, we are interested in individual psychological performance, conceptualized as a balance between the challenges or threats perceived in a situation and one’s sense of capability and resources, with the goal of successfully completing tasks. We explored the effects of working amidst continuous change on individual psychological performance and its maintenance among rescue service personnel with three research questions: (1) What kinds of changes have occurred in the work of rescue services? (2) What effects does work amidst changes have on individual psychological performance from the perspective of rescue service personnel? and (3) How can individual psychological performance be supported amidst changes from the perspective of rescue service personnel?
methodsThis was a qualitative interview study with fire officers and fire sub-officers (n = 18) from five rescue departments across Finland. The data was collected using semi-structured individual interviews in 2023 and 2024. Inductive content analysis was used.
resultsFor the first research question, the results were categorized into three categories: Evolving roles and pressures in rescue services; Reassignment of work locations; and Societal changes reflected in rescue services. The results of the second research question formed three categories: Change as a driver of declining workplace cohesion from leadership to the broader work community; Change causes multidimensional external and internal strains that challenge mental resources; and Change creates growth potential. For the third research question, two categories were formed: Clear people-focused leadership is essential when implementing change; and The significance of maintaining a positive and proactive mindset.
conclusionsThe closeness of the rescue service community should be supported, even during times of change, as well as the personnel’s willingness to develop. The changes have brought many new demands, and the uncertainty of one’s own competence and future role threatens psychological performance. The increasing demands highlight the need for stronger leadership support, underscoring the importance of people-focused leadership skills in rescue services. The usability of the IT systems that currently cause a significant workload should also be improved to better support psychological performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.