Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859354›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Skills, perception on barriers, and motivation in conducting research in Thai medical students.

Kittipong Panpanawan, Jiravadee Tangjariyatam, Pongtong Puranitee, Samart Pakakasama, Pornthep Tanpowpong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kittipong PanpanawanDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jiravadee TangjariyatamDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pongtong PuraniteeDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Samart PakakasamaDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pornthep TanpowpongDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. pornthep.tan@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur medical school has actively encouraged medical students to engage in research. This study aimed to survey students' perceptions of their research-specific and transferable skills (e.g., teamwork, communication skills), perceived barriers to conducting research, and motivations for participating.

methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand. Data were collected using a validated self-report 5-point Likert scale survey that assessed the aforementioned aspects. The survey questions underwent formal translation and were subsequently evaluated for inter-rater agreement, reliability, and validity. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify associations between various research skills and factors of interest.

resultsA total of 538 responses were collected, representing a response rate of 44%. Of these respondents, 66.5% were medical students in the pre-clinical years, and 50% were female. Additionally, 43% of the students reported prior involvement in research processes, such as proposal writing, data collection, and manuscript publication. Students expressed the highest confidence in research-specific skills like hypothesis generation and data collection while demonstrating the least confidence in biostatistical analyses. Regarding transferable skills, teamwork and working independently received the highest scores, whereas information evaluation received the lowest. The primary reported barrier to conducting research was a lack of interest. Students identified motivations for research, including the perception that "Doing research is useful for my resume," which aligns with an extrinsic motivation domain. Higher academic years in medical school (OR 1.28 [95% CI: 1.07, 1.53], P = .03) and prior research experience in writing proposals (OR 1.82 [95% CI: 1.57, 3.18], P = .006) were significantly associated with higher overall transferable skills. Furthermore, higher academic years (OR 1.18 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.35], P = .008) and prior research experience were also significantly associated with a higher perception of barriers in conducting research (OR 0.66 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.96], P = .03). Finally, prior experience in proposal writing was associated with higher scores in students' intrinsic motivation (OR 1.27 [95% CI: 1.08, 2.23], P = .02).

conclusionsEncouragement should be given to guidance on biostatistical analyses, which can foster research-specific skills and enhance information evaluation for transferable skills. Additionally, interventions aimed at stimulating interest in research among medical students may prove beneficial. Early research involvement, such as proposal writing, has the potential to improve transferable skills, reduce perceived barriers, and enhance intrinsic motivation for conducting research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchMotivationStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMaleSoutheast Asian PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandYoung AdultBarriersMedical studentsMotivationPerceptionResearchTransferable skills

Identifiers

PMID40859354
PMCPMC12379419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.