ArticleBMC medical education2025
Skills, perception on barriers, and motivation in conducting research in Thai medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fostering Research Engagement and Ideation: Insights from Medical Students in Thailand.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur medical school has actively encouraged medical students to engage in research. This study aimed to survey students' perceptions of their research-specific and transferable skills (e.g., teamwork, communication skills), perceived barriers to conducting research, and motivations for participating.
methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand. Data were collected using a validated self-report 5-point Likert scale survey that assessed the aforementioned aspects. The survey questions underwent formal translation and were subsequently evaluated for inter-rater agreement, reliability, and validity. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify associations between various research skills and factors of interest.
resultsA total of 538 responses were collected, representing a response rate of 44%. Of these respondents, 66.5% were medical students in the pre-clinical years, and 50% were female. Additionally, 43% of the students reported prior involvement in research processes, such as proposal writing, data collection, and manuscript publication. Students expressed the highest confidence in research-specific skills like hypothesis generation and data collection while demonstrating the least confidence in biostatistical analyses. Regarding transferable skills, teamwork and working independently received the highest scores, whereas information evaluation received the lowest. The primary reported barrier to conducting research was a lack of interest. Students identified motivations for research, including the perception that "Doing research is useful for my resume," which aligns with an extrinsic motivation domain. Higher academic years in medical school (OR 1.28 [95% CI: 1.07, 1.53], P = .03) and prior research experience in writing proposals (OR 1.82 [95% CI: 1.57, 3.18], P = .006) were significantly associated with higher overall transferable skills. Furthermore, higher academic years (OR 1.18 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.35], P = .008) and prior research experience were also significantly associated with a higher perception of barriers in conducting research (OR 0.66 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.96], P = .03). Finally, prior experience in proposal writing was associated with higher scores in students' intrinsic motivation (OR 1.27 [95% CI: 1.08, 2.23], P = .02).
conclusionsEncouragement should be given to guidance on biostatistical analyses, which can foster research-specific skills and enhance information evaluation for transferable skills. Additionally, interventions aimed at stimulating interest in research among medical students may prove beneficial. Early research involvement, such as proposal writing, has the potential to improve transferable skills, reduce perceived barriers, and enhance intrinsic motivation for conducting research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.