Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859324›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Potential determinant factors of electronic cigarette regulation in Nigeria: qualitative interview of potential regulators.

Anthony Weke, Colin Millard, Richard Holliday, Elaine McColl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony WekeDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus, Benton, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE7 7XA, UK. Anthony.weke@northumbria.ac.uk.
Colin MillardPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Richard HollidaySchool of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AZ, UK.
Elaine McCollPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organisation's (WHO) 2021 report on the global tobacco epidemic highlighted dangers of e-cigarettes to youth and stated that countries without e-cigarette regulations leave themselves particularly vulnerable to the activities of tobacco and related industries. Nigeria, with a large proportion of young people, is now considering regulating e-cigarettes. This qualitative study aimed to provide insight into the factors that could influence such regulation.

methodsThree participants were recruited using purposive sampling and interviewed as representatives of potential Nigerian e-cigarette regulators. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsFive factors that could influence e-cigarette regulations in Nigeria were identified i.e., existing regulatory framework; research evidence; public health considerations; economic considerations; and e-cigarette industry.

conclusionThe young population of Nigeria and WHO recommendations on regulation of e-cigarettes provides stimulus for Nigerian authorities to impose some form of regulation of e-cigarettes in Nigeria. Adhering to the Nigerian regulatory framework requires compliance with existing policies, and multiple stakeholder consultation. The involvement of multiple stakeholders can be beneficial for inclusivity but may introduce three competing interests, public health, economic, and industry interest, which may conflict and unduly influence e-cigarette regulations in Nigeria. Regulators should prioritise regulatory measures that serve the most essential needs of the population. The findings of this research is beneficial to decision makers as it can help with regulatory preparedness by promoting factors with positive potential to help Nigeria meet its regulatory responsibilities while minimizing factors that do the opposite.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsGovernment RegulationFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNigeriaPublic HealthQualitative ResearchTobacco IndustryElectronic cigarettesNigeriaQualitative studyRegulations

Identifiers

PMID40859324
PMCPMC12379397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.