ArticleTrials2025
Comparison of the effectiveness of first-line preventive treatment of migraine in primary care: study protocol for a pragmatic clinical trial (PREMI study).
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06499116 (Comparison of the Effectiveness of First-line Preventive Treatment of Migraine in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of the Effectiveness of First-line Preventive Treatment of Migraine in Primary Care: a Pragmatic Clinical Trial [PREMI Study]
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMigraine is a neurological disorder affecting approximately 12% of the population, more frequent in women, causing disability. Preventive treatment is recommended to prevent chronification and analgesics' abuse and to improve quality of life, but not all candidates receive it. Common preventive drugs include amitriptyline, flunarizine, propranolol, and topiramate. Their effectiveness and safety have not yet been assessed in our setting. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs in reducing the monthly migraine days (MMD) and to evaluate their safety.
methodsPhase IV, pragmatic randomized clinical trial of four parallel groups, open and multicentric, in Primary Care in Catalonia, Spain. We will include adults with migraine eligible for preventive treatment. They will be randomized to the following: (1) propranolol, (2) amitriptyline, (3) flunarizine, or (4) topiramate. The main efficacy measure will be the change in the mean MMD at week 12 in comparison to the mean MMD at baseline. Other secondary efficacy and safety measures will be assessed. The main non-inferiority analysis will be conducted in the per protocol population at week 12, comparing topiramate versus propranolol as the main analysis, and amitriptyline and flunarizine versus propranolol as exploratory analyses. DISCUSSION: There are epidemiological, clinical and pharmacological sex-differences in migraine which may result in differences in the use of migraine preventive drugs. However, the effectiveness of the most frequent preventive treatment and the differences in effectiveness and safety between women and men have not yet been studied. Moreover, as new expensive drugs have been authorized for preventive treatment, indicated when the usual drugs have failed, assessing the effectiveness and safety of the usual oral preventive drugs through a clinical trial is especially important. We also plan to evaluate their cost-effectiveness, and the clinical trial will count on an active contribution from patients through an app designed for this purpose, which may help in the management of the disease in the future.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06499116 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06499116 ). Trial registration date: July 12, 2024. EU CT Number: 2024-513597-22. Protocol ID: IJG-PREMI-2024. SPONSOR: Fundació d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol i Gurina. Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587, àtic. 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.