ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025
The native soil microbiome is critical for early root-associated microbiota assembly and canola growth.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harnessing plant microbiomes to enhance crop resilience and restore war-affected soils in Ukraine.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe native soil microbiome contributes to regulating the root-associated microbiota, root morphology, and plant growth. Using two canola (Brassica napus L.) genotypes contrasting in root size (small-rooted NAM23 and large-rooted NAM37), we investigated how the native soil microbiome influences canola establishment. Plants were grown in rhizoboxes containing gamma-irradiated (microbiome dysbiosis) or untreated (healthy microbiome) soils for 14 days. We evaluated plant growth and profiled bacterial and fungal communities in unplanted soil, rhizosphere soil, and root samples via DNA amplicon sequencing.
resultsSoil irradiation inhibited canola early growth, severely reducing shoot fresh mass (8 to 10-fold), root fresh mass and root length (3 to 13-fold). As expected, irradiation reduced microbial diversity and altered microbial community structure. The absence of significant soil physicochemical changes post-irradiation suggests that microbiome dysbiosis, rather than nutrient depletion, was the primary driver of plant growth suppression in irradiated soil. This growth suppression correlated with the depletion of potentially beneficial taxa (e.g., Sphingomonas, Alternaria prunicola, Fusarium, Gibberella avenacea, and Humicola nigrescens) and/or the enrichment of detrimental taxa (e.g., Mucilaginibacter, Leifsonia, and Trichoderma atrobrunneum) in both soil and roots. The large-rooted NAM37 outperformed the small-rooted NAM23 only in healthy microbiome-intact soils, but this growth advantage was not observed in unhealthy microbiome-disrupted irradiated soils.
conclusionsOur findings directly demonstrate the critical role of a healthy soil microbiome in supporting canola establishment. The absence of growth disparities between genotypes in irradiated soil indicates that plant fitness is not attributed to fixed root phenotypes but a dynamic interplay between intrinsic root traits and the microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.