ArticleTrials2025
Examining the effectiveness of Second Step Early Learning versus free play on socio-emotional learning in kindergarten: a cluster randomized controlled trial protocol.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06975267 (The Effectiveness of the Norwegian Version of Second Step Early Learning vs. Free Play on Socio-Emotional Learning in Kindergarten), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effectiveness of the Norwegian Version of Second Step Early Learning vs. Free Play on Socio-Emotional Learning in Kindergarten: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building health-promoting school environments: a longitudinal qualitative study of the Explo'Santé program in France.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis project evaluates the effectiveness of the Norwegian version of Second Step Early Learning (Nor-SSEL), a translated and culturally adapted Norwegian version of the American Second Step program, compared to free play in kindergartens, in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Nor-SSEL is a socio-emotional learning (SEL) program that spans 28 weeks, emphasizing the development of learning skills, friendship skills, and emotional management. We hypothesize that Nor-SSEL is superior to free play in enhancing children's social-emotional learning (SEL).
methodsWe will allocate 990 children within 66 kindergartens, which will be randomized at the kindergarten level. The primary outcome is child psychosocial adjustment, assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), as reported by parents and teachers at baseline, immediately after the 28-week intervention in the kindergarten, and then 7 months after the transition to the new school (K1). The secondary outcome is empathy, assessed using the Empathy Questionnaire for Children (EmQue), which parents and teachers report at the same time points as the SDQ. Mediator analysis will be explored using the Joint Attention Scale, and as the moderator, we will analyze the parents' socioeconomic status. A distal exploratory variable in follow-up assessment is academic achievement at the end of the first grade (math and reading skills). To reduce missing data, a web application will be developed to track children's behaviors via teachers, parents, and children's activities. DISCUSSION: We believe that the Nor-SSEL impacts the joint attention score, which, in turn, affects the SDQ score. This study contributes to the scientific understanding of how the SEL curriculum intervention can impact SEL and future academic achievement in kindergarten-aged children. This could shape early education policies and practices in kindergartens, as well as their potential application to social, emotional, and academic skills.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06975267. Registered on 16 May 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06975267 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.