ArticleBMC medical education2025
Improving intersectoral collaboration between formal healthcare workers and traditional bonesetters in resource-limited settings: evaluation of a pilot collaborative orthopaedic trauma course in rural Tanzania.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh trauma rates and limited orthopaedic care services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have led to reliance on traditional bonesetters (TBSs). Previous studies have set up formal training for TBSs to promote integration in the primary healthcare sector. However, the hierarchic structure of these initiatives poses the risk of alienating TBSs instead. Therefore, this study piloted a novel training strategy, by assessing the feasibility of an orthopaedic trauma course, involving bilateral knowledge exchange between both formal healthcare workers (FHWs) and TBSs.
methodsIn November 2024, TBSs and FHWs from Rorya district, rural Tanzania, attended a three-day basic trauma course, aimed at teaching basic extremity fracture care and enhancing collaboration. Data on demographics, pre- and post-course knowledge, changes in daily practice, and perspectives were collected through tests and interviews.
resultsFifteen FHWs and three TBSs participated in the training. Test results revealed a significant average increase in knowledge, from 79.1% pre-course to 86.5% directly post-course, which was maintained at 89.2% after 1 year post-course. In the interviews, most FHWs and TBSs noted changes in daily fracture care practice, the establishment of mutual understanding and respect, and supported expansion of the training course.
conclusionsThe results support the notion that merged training of FHWs and TBSs can improve fracture care-related knowledge of trainees. Wide support was observed for increased collaboration between FHWs and TBSs, indicating that this type of training is feasible and could be expanded into more extensive, formalized programs. Future programs could benefit from performing follow-up practical examination for objective verification of practice changes, referral monitoring and larger sample sizes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Involvement of TBSs in orthopaedic trauma courses for FHWs could enhance training effectiveness and intersectoral collaboration in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.