Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859196›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Electrophysiological evidence of processing social threat words in social anxiety participants.

Jinwei Yang, Feng Si, Jianqin Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinwei Yang *Key Laboratory of Basic Research and Health Management on Chronic Diseases in Heilongjiang Province, Harbin Medical University, Daqing Campus, Xinyang Street 39, Daqing, 163319, Heilongjiang, China.
Feng Si *Key Laboratory of Human Factors and Ergonomics for State Market Regulation, China National Institute of Standardization, No.4 Zhi Chun Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jianqin CaoKey Laboratory of Basic Research and Health Management on Chronic Diseases in Heilongjiang Province, Harbin Medical University, Daqing Campus, Xinyang Street 39, Daqing, 163319, Heilongjiang, China. cjq338@163.com.

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province LH2024H031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with social anxiety (SA) tend to show heightened attentional biases toward socially threatening information. However, it remains unclear at which stages of neural processing these biases emerge. This study aimed to clarify how social anxiety modulates the temporal dynamics of processing social threat words.

methodsElectroencephalogram (EEG) signals were recorded while participants performed an emotional Stroop task, in which neutral and social threat words were presented in sequential blocks (neutral followed by threat). Participants were divided into high-social-anxiety (HSA) and low-social-anxiety (LSA) groups based on Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) scores. Reaction times (RTs) and event-related potentials (ERPs)-specifically P2, early posterior negativity (EPN), and late positive potential (LPP)-were analyzed.

resultsBehaviorally, the HSA group exhibited significantly slower responses to threat words compared to neutral words, whereas no emotional effect was observed in the LSA group. ERP analyses showed that threat words elicited enhanced P2 amplitudes across both groups, suggesting increased early attentional orienting toward emotionally salient stimuli. Critically, the HSA group showed more negative EPN amplitudes to threat words, indicating intensified early-stage attentional allocation and perceptual encoding of emotional content. No significant effects of emotion or group differences were observed for the LPP component.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that social anxiety modulates early-stage processing of social threat. While P2 reflects generalized early attentional sensitivity to threat, EPN is more selectively heightened in socially anxious individuals, capturing both attentional and perceptual enhancements in emotional processing. Attentional biases in social anxiety may thus emerge primarily during early perceptual encoding rather than sustained evaluative stages.

Indexed as

AnxietyAttentional BiasEvoked PotentialsFearPhobia, SocialAdultAttentionElectroencephalographyEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeStroop TestYoung AdultEmotional stroop taskEmotion processingERPsSocial anxietySocial threat words

Identifiers

PMID40859196
PMCPMC12379492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.