ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Electrophysiological evidence of processing social threat words in social anxiety participants.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ERP characteristics in the process of hazard identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The neural dynamics of political socio-pragmatic violations: an ERP study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Contextual Predictability Modulates Neural Processing of Social Threat Words in High and Low Social Anxiety: Evidence from ERPs and Theta Oscillations.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with social anxiety (SA) tend to show heightened attentional biases toward socially threatening information. However, it remains unclear at which stages of neural processing these biases emerge. This study aimed to clarify how social anxiety modulates the temporal dynamics of processing social threat words.
methodsElectroencephalogram (EEG) signals were recorded while participants performed an emotional Stroop task, in which neutral and social threat words were presented in sequential blocks (neutral followed by threat). Participants were divided into high-social-anxiety (HSA) and low-social-anxiety (LSA) groups based on Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) scores. Reaction times (RTs) and event-related potentials (ERPs)-specifically P2, early posterior negativity (EPN), and late positive potential (LPP)-were analyzed.
resultsBehaviorally, the HSA group exhibited significantly slower responses to threat words compared to neutral words, whereas no emotional effect was observed in the LSA group. ERP analyses showed that threat words elicited enhanced P2 amplitudes across both groups, suggesting increased early attentional orienting toward emotionally salient stimuli. Critically, the HSA group showed more negative EPN amplitudes to threat words, indicating intensified early-stage attentional allocation and perceptual encoding of emotional content. No significant effects of emotion or group differences were observed for the LPP component.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that social anxiety modulates early-stage processing of social threat. While P2 reflects generalized early attentional sensitivity to threat, EPN is more selectively heightened in socially anxious individuals, capturing both attentional and perceptual enhancements in emotional processing. Attentional biases in social anxiety may thus emerge primarily during early perceptual encoding rather than sustained evaluative stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.