SynthesisBMC psychiatry2025
Effects of different interventions on anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of interventions for anxiety and depression in children and young people: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Role of Mast Cells and Neuroinflammation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders of the Developmental Period.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnxiety disorders are among the most prevalent psychiatric conditions, particularly affecting children and adolescents. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of anxiety in this population has increased, making it a significant public health concern. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various interventions for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents and identify the most effective approach to mitigate the impact of these disorders.
methodsWe conducted a thorough search of eligible randomized controlled trials across five databases: Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using R Studio, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE method.
resultsFrom 19,442 publications retrieved, 30 RCTs involving 1,711 participants were included. The results showed that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy was the most effective intervention for treating anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (MD = -3.83 [95% CrI: -9.33, 1.51]). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy was the second most effective (MD = -3.64 [95% CrI: -7.36, -0.48]), followed by Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (MD = -2.53 [95% CrI: -8.23, 3.32]) and Physical Exercise (MD = -2.16 [95% CrI: -9.99, 5.52]).
conclusionsAcceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) appears to be the most effective intervention for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution due to the overall low quality of evidence, high heterogeneity, and imprecision in the results. Future research should investigate the potential benefits of combining physical exercise or virtual reality-assisted therapies. Moreover, large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are essential to further validate and refine these findings.
trial registrationPROSPERO, CRD42024587910.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.