Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40859169›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2025

Unveiling the cultivable yeast endophyte diversity in muscadine grape berries and their known functional prospects.

Meenakshi Agarwal, Mehboob B Sheikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meenakshi AgarwalCenter for Viticulture & Small Fruit Research, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, 32317, USA. meenakshi.agarwal@famu.edu.
Mehboob B SheikhCenter for Viticulture & Small Fruit Research, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, 32317, USA.

Funding

National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences 2021-38821-34580National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-38821-34711National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-38821-39591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscadine grapes, which are valued for their fresh consumption, boutique wine production with distinctive flavors and aromas, and disease resistance, provide a unique ecological niche for investigating endophytic yeast communities. Despite their potential, the cultivable diversity and functional capabilities of these yeasts remain largely underexplored. In this study, we investigated culturable endophytic yeasts from the unskinned berries of diverse muscadine and bunch grape cultivars. Through molecular identification and morphological analysis, we identified 48 distinct yeast isolates spanning 18 species and 12 genera, with a predominance of non-Saccharomyces yeasts. Hanseniaspora guilliermondii emerged as the most abundant species, followed by members of the Pichia genus. Notably, novel species such as Nakaseomyces nivariensis and Wickerhamiella sorbophila were discovered, expanding the known diversity of grape-associated yeasts. Their documented roles in other grape systems highlight species-specific abilities to enhance wine quality, control pathogens, promote plant growth, and offer broader biotechnological applications. These findings not only deepen our understanding of yeast–grape interactions but also highlight diverse microbial reservoirs with promising applications in agriculture, food science, and biotechnology. This work lays the foundation for leveraging endophytic yeasts to increase crop quality, sustainability, and innovation across multiple domains.

Indexed as

EndophytesFruitVitisYeastsBiodiversityDNA, FungalPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNAWineDNA, FungalBiocontrolEndophytesFermentationMuscadine grapeVitis rotundifoliaYeast

Identifiers

PMID40859169
PMCPMC12379518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.