ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Nonparametric analysis of quality-of-life measures for randomized clustered design: the R package npclust.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pre-Post intervention factorial design with multiple observations for each subject before and after the intervention frequently arises in Quality-of-Life (QoL) research. Usually not only a global hypothesis on intervention is of interest, but also the hypotheses of pre-post change and also the interaction between intervention and pre-post change. In most practical situations, the distribution of the observed data is unknown and there may exist a number of atypical measurements and outliers. More importantly, QoL outcomes are measured in rating scales and the multiple Quality-of-Life measurements before and after the intervention present complex within-subject correlations. Hence, use of parametric and semi-parametric procedures that impose restrictive distributional and correlation assumptions becomes questionable. This emphasizes the demand for statistical procedures that enable us to accurately and reliably analyze QoL outcomes with minimal conditions. Nonparametric methods offer such a possibility and thus become of particular practical importance in the field of QoL. In this article, we aim to expose researchers and practitioners in the biomedical and behavioral science to nonparametric methods for the analysis of data collected in clustered randomized design. We also illustrate the use of the R package npclust we developed for an easy and user-friendly access to nonparametric methods for the analysis of Quality-of-Life data. It provides procedures for pre-processing the data, performing various hypothesis tests and computing confidence intervals for the estimated effects. The procedures also contain methods for visual display of the results. We illustrate the implemented procedures with Pediatric Asthma Quality-of-Life data collected from the Asthma Randomized Trial of Indoor wood Smoke (ARTIS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.