ArticleBMC neuroscience2025
Distinct neural circuits processing pleasant and unpleasant sounds: an fMRI-based approach.
Article in BMC neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInvestigating how the human brain processes the emotional valance of sounds is critical for understanding sensory, emotional, and motor integration at the neurobiological level. The current study utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the differential brain activation patterns elicited by pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral sounds from the International Affective Digital Sounds (IADS-2) collection. Thirty healthy volunteers listened to these sounds under fMRI, followed by post-scan ratings of valence (pleasant versus unpleasant) and arousal (calm versus exciting).
resultsAverage ratings did not differ from IADS-2 norms. Pleasant sounds significantly activated brain regions implicated in reward and positive affect, including the mPFC, ventral anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior frontal gyrus, compared to neutral sounds. Alternatively, unpleasant sounds elicited stronger and more widespread activation, particularly in the amygdala, nucleus accumbens, insula, and cerebellum, regions associated with negative affect and aversive learning.
conclusionThese results demonstrate the pivotal contributions of the amygdala in identifying unpleasant stimuli and of the mPFC in assessing pleasant auditory inputs, expand our current understanding of affective regulation at the neural circuit level, and provide a foundation for the development of sound-based interventions to treat auditory-emotional disorders such as misophonia and anxiety. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.